Rabbinical divorce recognized in Greece
A court in Thessaloniki has recognized a rabbinical divorce registered at the district court of Haifa. Greece and Israel have not signed a bilateral convention on recognition and enforcement of judgments; however, Greece does not require reciprocity for the purposes of recognition [Thessaloniki 1st Instance court Nr. 7333/2013, unreported].
THE FACTS: The applicant
concluded in 1985 a religious marriage with her ex-husband in Tel Aviv. The
marriage was properly registered at the Tel Aviv rabbinical office. A year
later, the Haifa district rabbinical court registered an agreement of the
spouses to dissolve their marriage, thus granting to the agreement the force of
a court decision. The latter was submitted to the Thessaloniki 1st
instance court, with the request to be recognized in Greece.
THE RULING: The court applied Article 323, in conjunction with
Article 905 Para. 1,2 & 4 Greek Code of Civil Procedure, i.e. the provisions
regulating the issue of recognition of foreign judgments in personal status
matters. The court examined the file and the pertinent facts, and allowed
recognition, because the requirements set by Art. 323 CPC were met.
In particular, the finality of the
Israeli divorce decree was proven by a certificate of the applicant’s second
marriage, celebrated again in Tel Aviv in 1989. In addition, the court took
note of a confirmation letter issued by the local Rabbi, according to which, a
rabbinical divorce, as the one in question, is final and conclusive pursuant to
the laws of the state of Israel, because rabbinical courts are solely, i.e.
exclusively competent to issue a divorce between citizens of Jewish religion;
hence, civil courts aren’t allowed to issue divorce decrees.
In addition, the remaining
requirements to recognition were also met, i.e. international jurisdiction of
the Haifa rabbinical district court, rights of audience of the parties, and no
inconsistency to a Greek decision involving the same parties.
Coming to the last prerequisite,
i.e. public policy, the court elaborated as follows: The sole fact that the
dissolution of marriage was issued by a religious rabbinical court, i.e. an
institution unknown to domestic justice perceptions, does not mean to suggest a
violation of Greek public order, since its content (and its pertinent legal
effect) resemble to those of a domestic civil court, when hearing an
application for a divorce decree in mutual consent (Article 1441 Greek Civil
Code).
COMMENTS: As far as I’m aware of, there hasn’t been any
reported case on the matter up to date in Greece. Hence, the decision per se is
a positive step, setting a precedent for similar cases in the future. Clearly,
the court had an easy task, given the fact that the dissolution was the fruit
of a mutual agreement, allowing the Greek judge to refer to the equivalent
institution of Article 1441 Civil Code. Nevertheless, avoiding the public
policy mind field was not as easy as it looks, and this choice should undoubtedly
be regarded as the right one.
On a more technical matter, the
court was satisfied in regards to the foreign decision’s finality on the
grounds of the applicant’s second marriage (evidenced by a certificate), and
the confirmation letter issued by the local Rabbi. The prevailing opinion is
however, that foreign res iudicata must be evidenced by a certificate issued from
the court which rendered the judgment. A failure to produce the above might
lead the court to ask for the reopening of proceedings, so that the applicant be
granted time to furnish the required document in the ensuing hearing. Still,
courts have shown flexibility in several cases, and accepted alternative ways
of proving res iudicata, one of those being the decision at hand.
Labels: Greek Code of Civil Procedure